Page 269 of 377

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 10:00 pm
by Twinny
Dr Shaneman wrote:Basically Pokemon but they evolved up via devices.
^ The most basic explanation I've seen yet. lol

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 10:26 pm
by Dr Shaneman
mtwinny wrote:^ The most basic explanation I've seen yet. lol
My "in a nutshell" version.

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:17 pm
by TCB
mtwinny wrote:^ The most basic explanation I've seen yet. lol
Pokemon - Poke + Digi = Digimon

There.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 7:21 pm
by IvyRave
When I was little I loved digimon and even created paper dolls of the characters. I also did some for Kids Next Door and Harry Potter. That was one epic crossover.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 7:46 pm
by Gonic
TheChaosBlue wrote:Pokemon - Poke + Digi = Digimon

There.
Digimon was based on the whole tamagotchi craze back in the day. Nothing like pokemon imo. In fact its better imo. :P

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 7:48 pm
by TCB
Gonic wrote:Digimon was based on the whole tamagotchi craze back in the day. Nothing like pokemon imo. In fact its better imo. :P
That didn't stop people from comparing it to Pokemon in the day.

And Tamagotchi was the sh-t back in the day, yo.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 8:35 pm
by Dr Shaneman
I think the names alone made people compare them both.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 8:55 pm
by Gonic
Didn't digimon just come out at an unfournate time or something? I remember reading somethig like that somewhere

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 8:59 pm
by Dr Shaneman
I always thought that viewers simply comparing it to Pokemon naturally killed off.
Thinking it was too much of a cheap rip-off.

Then again they originally said that about Yu-Gi-Oh and that kept going so I'm probably wrong.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 9:27 pm
by TCB
Yu-Gi-Oh is nowhere near the popularity it was back then.