Page 269 of 377
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 10:00 pm
by Twinny
Dr Shaneman wrote:Basically Pokemon but they evolved up via devices.
^ The most basic explanation I've seen yet. lol
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 10:26 pm
by Dr Shaneman
mtwinny wrote:^ The most basic explanation I've seen yet. lol
My "in a nutshell" version.
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:17 pm
by TCB
mtwinny wrote:^ The most basic explanation I've seen yet. lol
Pokemon - Poke + Digi = Digimon
There.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 7:21 pm
by IvyRave
When I was little I loved digimon and even created paper dolls of the characters. I also did some for Kids Next Door and Harry Potter. That was one epic crossover.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 7:46 pm
by Gonic
TheChaosBlue wrote:Pokemon - Poke + Digi = Digimon
There.
Digimon was based on the whole tamagotchi craze back in the day. Nothing like pokemon imo. In fact its better imo.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 7:48 pm
by TCB
Gonic wrote:Digimon was based on the whole tamagotchi craze back in the day. Nothing like pokemon imo. In fact its better imo.
That didn't stop people from comparing it to Pokemon in the day.
And Tamagotchi was the sh-t back in the day, yo.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 8:35 pm
by Dr Shaneman
I think the names alone made people compare them both.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 8:55 pm
by Gonic
Didn't digimon just come out at an unfournate time or something? I remember reading somethig like that somewhere
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 8:59 pm
by Dr Shaneman
I always thought that viewers simply comparing it to Pokemon naturally killed off.
Thinking it was too much of a cheap rip-off.
Then again they originally said that about Yu-Gi-Oh and that kept going so I'm probably wrong.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 9:27 pm
by TCB
Yu-Gi-Oh is nowhere near the popularity it was back then.