Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 2:52 am
Read the review and you'll see why the score is so low, he does make good points.
No need to reply to this post.
No need to reply to this post.
RadioSEGA Message Board
https://www.radiosega.net/forum/
This.RWDebara wrote:Read the review and you'll see why the score is so low, he does make good points.
No need to reply to this post.
Same here i remember enjoying it as a kid but when i went back to it i did not have fun at all, i ended up turning it off and i havn't touched it since. I do think they improved the Sonic levels from SA1 but what turned me off was the Knuckles/rouge and tails/robotniks levels. Those levels was just horrible. Especially the Knuckles/Rouge levels.Shadid wrote:This.
If you read his whole review, you'll notice that he made very good points about SA2. Yes, I was one of those who was eluded that it was the best 3D game until I replayed it. I had the same reaction as Rek, and honestly, didn't care that much anymore about it.
Agreed the Chao Garden was fun. Really enjoyed the lazy and Demonic Chao xD Always found the lazy one on a beach chair sleeping....Shadid wrote:And I still stand on the Chao Garden being the only good thing about the game.
Well, if you disagree, then show us why you do. Defensive criticism is what makes the discussion go well.Biggest sonic fan wrote:I read the review and the only thing I heard was awful awful awful. That's not even right.
But why should I boder to complain. Nobody will listen to me and say "Oh, he made some good points on it." WTF? I disagree with mostly everything you said, that was just a review I will never forget.
Reknoc, you truly are a gamer of one kind.
Yes, I can agree that on Sonic/Shadow's level design was okay, the only issue is that it just. THOSE. RAILS. EVERYWHERE. *insert on-rails joke here*RWDebara wrote:Same here i remember enjoying it as a kid but when i went back to it i did not have fun at all, i ended up turning it off and i havn't touched it since. I do think they improved the Sonic levels from SA1 but what turned me off was the Knuckles/rouge and tails/robotniks levels. Those levels was just horrible. Especially the Knuckles/Rouge levels.
Fine. here is goes:Shadid wrote:Well, if you disagree, then show us why you do. Defensive criticism is what makes the discussion go well.
Reknoc wrote:Story is a Sonic story, awful awful awful
Opposite? You kidding me? I am so happy there were no more Big Stages with those irretating fishing levels. Sometimes it took me hours to complete. And than awful hub world? The hub world was so fun in SA1. maybe in Sonic 06 it wasn't because sonic was slow and all that but it is so fun to run with Sonic in fast speed knowing that no enemy or rings or opsticles will be there to make you stop. To tell you the truph, I really enjoyed the Gamma Stages. Sure you can't run as fast as Sonic but it was so fun shooting everything in your way and not caring about anything else. The only thing was the time which was removed in SA2 which makes the stages even more fun, and that's my opinion.Reknoc wrote:Instead of taking what was good and improving it while fixing or removing what was bad, Sonic Adventure 2 seems to have done entirely the opposite, taken what was bad and making it worse while breaking or removing what made it good. That said at least they did remove the awful hub world rubbish.
I can't really discribe it but a good and the only example would be Reknoc. He is just soo... different.Shadid wrote:And I do want to know what's that one kind of gamer you mentioned, if I may ask.
There were a few annoying glitches in the first Sonic Adventure. Wasn't there a wall glitch in Sonic's first level where Sonic can go through a wall while at full speed if he hits it just right? You lose a life by doing that. I try to veer him away from the wall using the D-pad whenever I get to that point so I don't die stupidly.CapnCloudchaser wrote:If a game has really game breaking bugs that actively work against you or stop you from playing, like Sonic 06, then it is a bad game. I never had any problems with SA1/2 in that regard.
Okay to be fair I should have been more clear about this, it's hard to class Sonic 1-3's storys as Sonic Storys as they're more Typical Platformer Storys You'd Never Know If You Didn't Look At The Manual. But Sonic Adventure is kinda where "Sonic Story" starts in the games (I guess SatAM would be earlier and maybe even the comics) in which the awful plot is told in the game with cutscenes.Biggest sonic fan wrote:Fine. here is goes:
So every single Sonic Story is awful? So rescuing animals from robots is awful? So all Sonic games' story is awful?
Again I repeat; Terrible yank buttrock doesn't do it for me.Biggest sonic fan wrote:Second, Not all the music was awful. I loved It doesn't matter. Live and Learn isn't really my taste but it was still a nice song. Escape from the city was very good too. I also really like E.G.G.M.A.N. If that's what you say, for you, every Sonic music is awful.
I think what I mean is pretty obvious, it's hard to take any of this seriously when I know you haven't played the game yet.Biggest sonic fan wrote:And what do you mean:
Opposite? You kidding me? I am so happy there were no more Big Stages with those irretating fishing levels. Sometimes it took me hours to complete. And than awful hub world? The hub world was so fun in SA1. maybe in Sonic 06 it wasn't because sonic was slow and all that but it is so fun to run with Sonic in fast speed knowing that no enemy or rings or opsticles will be there to make you stop. To tell you the truph, I really enjoyed the Gamma Stages. Sure you can't run as fast as Sonic but it was so fun shooting everything in your way and not caring about anything else. The only thing was the time which was removed in SA2 which makes the stages even more fun, and that's my opinion.
The only thing might have been the Rouge/knuckles stages that might have been boring but I still disagree with you saying the Tail/Eggman stages were bad.
Thanks.Biggest sonic fan wrote:I can't really discribe it but a good and the only example would be Reknoc. He is just soo... different.
Hah. Well not playing it clearly isn't stopping you.Biggest sonic fan wrote:One day, I promise you, One day, I will get Sonic Adventure 2 and will finish it. Than I will return to this exact tread and write how wrong you are and what an awesome game it is. Heck, I might even make my own review out of it.![]()
But I still mostly disagree with what you said. Maybe it's because I am only 13 and will understand if I grow up but I don't think that's the case and I think that you are very wrong. You just dislike Sonic reknoc and saying that, I realised that I never saw you saying a Sonic game was great and whenever we talked about a Sonic game, you said it was rubbish.
Here, I'm done. Now come and say how wrong I am...
Had I not seperated Chao Garden from it I'd probably have given it a 2 aswell.Wrath Oskvro wrote:This is more of a general look at recent Sonic games.
Personally I wouldn't give this game a 1/5..I'd give a 2 at least.
You kidding me? Nothing can stop me from what I believe in. I am even willing to one day buy Sonic 06 and give it a try. I'm sure it's not as bad as people say it is...Wrath Oskvro wrote: I like looking for a screw that I dropped on the ground.
Reknoc wrote:Hah. Well not playing it clearly isn't stopping you.