Well in Australia there is also a preowned shop called "Game Traders".
Well I geuss it isn't much of a big deal but I dont have much time to go to that shop so I wished the games would be at the local games store.
SEGA de-listing Sonic games with low scores
- Quills on Wheels
- Level 15
- Posts: 4452
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 1:08 pm
- Location: Land of Down Under
- Quills on Wheels
- Level 15
- Posts: 4452
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 1:08 pm
- Location: Land of Down Under
Kaito-kun wrote:If even the publisher (the people who want you to buy the game) are now telling you that the games aren't that good then why are you still bothering to defend them and look for new ways to obtain them? Seems like good riddance to bad rubbish really.
I am not defending them. It is my right to try the game myself and see how it is. And besides, I dont care if it is awsome or totally Bull Crap, I just love sonic games and I can't stop myself buying them.
- Kaito-kun
- Level 15
- Posts: 5589
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 8:46 pm
- Location: Scotland
- Preferred pronouns: He/Him/They
- Contact:
Well that's fair enough I suppose; everyone's entitled to their judgements, however I was pointing out that when the publisher admits their game isn't worth selling then it's really not a good sign.Biggest sonic fan wrote:It is my right to try the game myself and see how it is.
That's the more worrying thing. By running around and buying a product just because it has a particular mascot on the cover only leads to companies getting lazy and releasing products of a lower and lower standard because they know people are going to buy them anyway. I doubt anyone want that to happen.Biggest sonic fan wrote:And besides, I don't care if it is awesome or totally Bull Crap, I just love sonic games and I can't stop myself buying them.
Oh...Wait...It has happened, hasn't it?
I actually can't see what the big deal is here, except with a couple of exceptions - the Rush games.
If the Rush games are to be deleted, then SEGA are actually removing two of the best Sonic games in recent history. The rest I don't mind seeing the back of, but those two?
It also explains why Sonic 06 was removed from the 360s Games on Demand service.
If the Rush games are to be deleted, then SEGA are actually removing two of the best Sonic games in recent history. The rest I don't mind seeing the back of, but those two?
It also explains why Sonic 06 was removed from the 360s Games on Demand service.

-
- Level 2
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 10:21 pm
Wow, has SEGA just had a brain-wave? Finally they are getting rid of those games I dare not call part of the Sonic the Hedgehog franchise!RWDebara wrote:On SEGA news site and Sonic sites (SEGABits,Sonic Stadium, etc.) just found info that supposedly SEGA is de-listing Sonic games with "average to low scores".
(im sure not all these games are out but just to give you an idea if this is true)
Few Links:
http://www.mcvuk.com/news/41217/Sub-sta ... -de-listed
http://www.segabits.com/?p=4766
http://www.sonicstadium.org/news/2010/1 ... om-retail/
Anyway don't know what to make of this.
Your thoughts?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests